The NFL has recently made a significant shift by embracing institutional capital, effectively ending its long-standing resistance to private equity investments. In a recent resolution, the league now permits private equity funding for individual teams, aligning itself with major U.S. sports leagues like the NBA, NHL, MLB, and MLS, which have already integrated institutional investments. Remarkably, the only dissenting voice was Mike Brown, the owner of the Cincinnati Bengals, who opposed the proposal, citing his commitment to protecting the financial health of smaller franchises amid soaring team valuations and media revenues.
While this new ownership structure may not produce immediate changes, some industry experts suspect that a gradual transition towards private equity’s profit-centered motives is on the horizon. The NFL has strategically placed limits on private equity investments, restricting individual funds to a maximum 10% stake in any franchise, barring them from decision-making roles, and requiring them to hold their investments for at least six years. Currently, only four funds are allowed to invest, each known for their long-term visions and substantial financial assets. Notably, sovereign wealth funds and similar entities are prohibited from entering the league, in stark contrast to the NBA’s approach, which welcomed a wider variety of investors back in 2022.
Historically, the NFL resisted welcoming institutional investments, believing that the interests of the league and these investors were fundamentally incompatible. While the NFL focuses on the welfare of teams, fans, and the sport as a whole, private equity investors typically prioritize shareholder profits. However, rapidly increasing team valuations—roughly $5.9 billion for the average NFL team, compared to $4 billion in the NBA and $2.6 billion in MLB—have led the league to reconsider its stance. The shrinking pool of ultra-wealthy individuals capable of purchasing teams has further motivated the NFL to open its doors to private equity investments, offering franchise owners essential capital to stay competitive.
The NFL’s initial limits on private equity investments seem designed to maintain its family-oriented image, which is deeply rooted in communities and fan loyalty. During discussions about these regulatory changes, New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft emphasized that the focus would remain on community rather than profit—a statement that invites skepticism. As the league opens itself to private equity investment, the concern is that it may pave the way for a more commercialized and profit-driven future.
The overarching goal of this investment strategy is to diversify the pool of potential investors, inherently increasing competition for ownership stakes. The NFL has kept a tightly controlled ownership model, limiting purchases to a select group of extremely wealthy individuals. Broadening the investor base could drive up team valuations even further, making institutional investments more appealing and harder to ignore.
This speculation is grounded in the experiences of other leagues, such as the NBA, which first embraced outside investments in 2020. Although initial talks highlighted a commitment to community and reputation, the league has since attracted a wider and potentially more controversial array of investors. Although current regulations cap sovereign wealth funds at a 5% stake per club, it’s reasonable to predict that the NFL may follow a similar path toward increased financialization.
The NFL is acutely aware of how unregulated investment practices can negatively affect fan sentiment, as evidenced by recent controversies in European soccer—like the Super League protests and dissatisfaction over rising ticket prices. This awareness might be why the league has cautiously engaged with institutional investments to date. Reports indicate that the NFL plans to claim a share of profits from private equity investors at the time of sale, ensuring that financial gains benefit the league as a whole, rather than just a select few owners.
However, institutional investors—often driven by the desire for high returns—pose their own challenges. In the Premier League, the contemporary focus of sports investment has shifted from exit strategies to generating consistent revenue over extended periods. Investors may find opportunities for lucrative dividends even in clubs that aren’t profit-generating, leading to a revenue-driven paradigm where losses can be leveraged for tax advantages.
Many NFL-sanctioned private equity investors have similar profit-driven motivations as some of the Premier League’s most criticized owners, often holding stakes in European football clubs, which speaks to their focus on revenue streams. For instance, Sixth Street, now permitted to invest in the NFL, has already made considerable investments in Barcelona and Real Madrid.
As the NFL ventures into the realm of institutional investment, it faces the challenge of balancing the attraction of new capital while preserving the sport’s core values. The league has a unique opportunity to avoid missteps seen in other sports, but whether it will capitalize on this moment remains uncertain. The Premier League’s transformation serves as a cautionary tale, demonstrating how new wealth and stadiums can alienate dedicated fans, replacing meaningful experiences with commercial alternatives. Unless the NFL proactively addresses these concerns, it risks following a similar path, succumbing to the pressures of financialization and market demands.
About the author