During a recent flight from Sydney to Tokyo, passengers encountered an unexpected predicament when the in-flight entertainment system malfunctioned. Instead of choosing popular films like *The Fall Guy* or *Inside Out 2*, they found themselves gravitating toward a movie that primarily features Dakota Johnson and Sean Penn engaged in conversations inside a taxi.
Stuart Heritage, a journalist, described the scenario as a “perfect storm,” a term used to describe a situation where multiple factors come together to create chaos. He even proposed a new term, “Daddio,” to encapsulate this unique occurrence, particularly highlighting the puzzling decision to screen a film with explicit content on a packed airplane.
On flight QF59, a technical issue prevented passengers from selecting their own movies, prompting the crew to gather opinions from those on board. To everyone’s surprise, the clear favorite was “Daddio,” a drama that includes some risqué scenes that are decidedly not family-friendly. Passengers had no choice but to watch this film, unable to pause or change the channel on their individual screens, while the film’s explicit content, which featured sexting exchanges, made matters even more uncomfortable.
While Qantas eventually replaced “Daddio” with a kids’ film, Heritage couldn’t help but reflect on the absurdity of the situation. He recalled a school incident where a teacher mistakenly played an inappropriate film, a blunder that feels oddly relatable in this context.
The more pressing question, however, is why passengers would choose “Daddio” over more mainstream and entertaining offerings. Despite its explicit nature, the film has been largely criticized for its dullness, with most of the action confined to a taxi and lengthy discussions.
Heritage shared his confusion over the group’s collective choice, speculating about the mindset of those who preferred to endure 101 minutes of somber dialogue instead of opting for more entertaining alternatives. This brings forth a troubling question about the shared psychology of a crowd that would select such a film during their flight. In his opinion, that choice might warrant even more examination than the film’s explicit content itself.
About the author